Summary
The Wife of Bath
begins the Prologue to her tale by establishing herself as an authority on
marriage, due to her extensive personal experience with the institution. Since
her first marriage at the tender age of twelve, she has had five husbands. She
says that many people have criticized her for her numerous marriages, most of
them on the basis that Christ went only once to a wedding, at Cana in Galilee.
The Wife of Bath has her own views of Scripture and God’s plan. She says that
men can only guess and interpret what Jesus meant when he told a Samaritan
woman that her fifth husband was not her husband. With or without this bit of
Scripture, no man has ever been able to give her an exact reply when she asks
to know how many husbands a woman may have in her lifetime. God bade us to wax
fruitful and multiply, she says, and that is the text that she wholeheartedly
endorses. After all, great Old Testament figures, like Abraham, Jacob, and
Solomon, enjoyed multiple wives at once. She admits that many great Fathers of
the Church have proclaimed the importance of virginity, such as the Apostle
Paul. But, she reasons, even if virginity is important, someone must be
procreating so that virgins can be created. Leave virginity to the perfect, she
says, and let the rest of us use our gifts as best we may—and her gift,
doubtless, is her sexual power. She uses this power as an “instrument” to
control her husbands.
At this point, the
Pardoner interrupts. He is planning to marry soon and worries that his wife
will control his body, as the Wife of Bath describes. The Wife of Bath tells
him to have patience and to listen to the whole tale to see if it reveals the
truth about marriage. Of her five husbands, three have been “good” and two have
been “bad.” The first three were good, she admits, mostly because they were
rich, old, and submissive. She laughs to recall the torments that she put these
men through and recounts a typical conversation that she had with her older
husbands. She would accuse her -husband of having an affair, launching into a
tirade in which she would charge him with a bewildering array of
accusations. If one of her husbands got drunk, she would claim he said
that every wife is out to destroy her husband. He would then feel guilty and
give her what she wanted. All of this, the Wife of Bath tells the rest of the
pilgrims, was a pack of lies—her husbands never held these opinions, but she
made these claims to give them grief. Worse, she would tease her husbands in
bed, refusing to give them full satisfaction until they promised her money. She
admits proudly to using her verbal and sexual power to bring her husbands to
total submission.
Analysis
In her lengthy
Prologue, the Wife of Bath recites her autobiography, announcing in her very
first word that “experience” will be her guide. Yet, despite her claim that
experience is her sole authority, the Wife of Bath apparently feels the need to
establish her authority in a more scholarly way. She imitates the ways of
churchmen and scholars by backing up her claims with quotations from Scripture
and works of antiquity. The Wife carelessly flings around references as textual
evidence to buttress her argument, most of which don’t really correspond to her
points. Her reference to Ptolemy’s Almageste,
for instance, is completely erroneous—the phrase she attributes to that book
appears nowhere in the work. Although her many errors display her lack of real
scholarship, they also convey Chaucer’s mockery of the churchmen present, who
often misused Scripture to justify their devious actions.
The text of the
Wife of Bath’s Prologue is based in the medieval genre of allegorical
“confession.” In a morality play, a personified vice such as Gluttony or Lust
“confesses” his or her sins to the audience in a life story. The Wife is
exactly what the medieval Church saw as a “wicked woman,” and she is proud of
it—from the very beginning, her speech has undertones of conflict with her
patriarchal society. Because the statements that the Wife of Bath attributes to
her husbands were taken from a number of satires published in Chaucer’s time,
which half-comically portrayed women as unfaithful, superficial, evil
creatures, always out to undermine their husbands, feminist critics have often
tried to portray the Wife as one of the first feminist characters in
literature.
This interpretation
is weakened by the fact that the Wife of Bath herself conforms to a number of
these misogynist and misogamist (antimarriage) stereotypes. For example, she
describes herself as sexually voracious but at the same time as someone who
only has sex to get money, thereby combining two contradictory stereotypes. She
also describes how she dominated her husband, playing on a fear that was common
to men, as the Pardoner’s nervous interjection reveals. Despite their
contradictions, all of these ideas about women were used by men to support a
hierarchy in which men dominated women.
No comments:
Post a Comment